Veda solutions

For cms

0
0
0
cms

CMS 2025 Final Rule: New Behavioral Health Requirements for MA Plans

Mental Health Awareness Month and Summary of New CMS Final Rule

Fitting for Mental Health Awareness Month, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently released its 2025 Final Rule that, among other things, aims to improve access to behavioral health providers for Medicare Advantage members.


Ready to learn about the CMS 2025 Final Rule and Veda’s strategic approach to its behavioral health network requirements?

The CMS 2025 Final Rule significantly expands the behavioral health network requirements for Medicare Advantage (MA) health plans. As reported by Fierce Healthcare, all Medicare Advantage plans will likely see increased administrative burdens due to the behavioral health network expansion requirements.

Not only is Veda a proven and trusted partner for achieving compliance with CMS requirements, Veda’s solutions are unrivaled in their ability to help health plans verify, expand, improve, and map their behavioral health networks.

Here are the behavioral health requirements covered in the Contract Year 2025 Medicare Advantage and Part D Final Rule and Veda’s approach:

New “Outpatient Behavioral Health” Category Added to Network Adequacy Evaluations 

Building upon CMS’s recent addition of a new benefit category for mental health counselors (MHCs) and marriage and family therapists (MFTs)—and recognizing that many MHCs and MFTs practice in outpatient behavioral health facilities—CMS has expanded its network adequacy requirements to include a new category called “Outpatient Behavioral Health.”

Wide Range of Specialists Included in “Outpatient Behavioral Health” Category

More specialties and outpatient care classifications were added to solve behavioral health provider shortages. The specialists in the new “Outpatient Behavioral Health” category include MHCs, MFTs, Opioid Treatment Program providers, Community Mental Health Centers, addiction medicine physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs).

Skill Sets of Certain Behavioral Providers Must Be Verified 

“Outpatient Behavioral Health” Facility Added to Time & Distance Standards and Telehealth Specialty Requirements

CMS now includes the “Outpatient Behavioral Health” facility specialty in the list of specialty types that will receive a 10% credit toward meeting time and distance standards. Additionally, MA plan’s networks must include at least one telehealth provider within the Outpatient Behavioral Health specialty.

Veda is Equipped to Meet The Needs Introduced By The 2025 CMS Rule Changes

Veda excels at helping health plans and systems connect members with behavioral health services, treatment facilities, and telehealth providers. The 2025 MA rule changes are an opportunity for health plans and health systems to explore how Veda can help them expand, improve, and map their behavioral health networks and verify the claims data for behavioral health providers.

Veda’s solutions can help connect members to quality behavioral health services more quickly, efficiently, and at less cost than the traditional methods relied on in the past. Armed with the most accurate provider data available, Veda’s solutions contribute to positive member experiences while helping people find the right care for their behavioral health needs.

 

CMS Directory Accuracy Audits and Sanctions: Achieving True Directory Accuracy

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regularly audits health plan programs and provider directories. All health plans providing services to Medicare and Medicare Advantage members are nearly guaranteed to be audited by CMS. By definition, the CMS directory accuracy audits aim to improve patient access and experience. Additionally, many standards for provider directories and network adequacy are developed based on CMS regulations.

Veda works with health plans to prepare for CMS audits and then interpret and address their audit results.

Unfortunately, health plans’ directory accuracy claims may not match with CMS’s findings—in the case of lower accuracy discovered, the plans may receive CMS sanctions and fines. Why are the directory accuracy rates differing and what can be done to reconcile the accuracy rates?

Why do accuracy rates determined by CMS and health insurance providers differ?

ai regulation questions

Many factors determine accuracy rates in provider directories. CMS zeroes in on specific fields (such as name, address, and phone number) for determining accuracy while insurance providers may go further in determining accuracy (such as specialty fields). Here are the reasons why updating directories while maintaining high accuracy levels—is an uphill battle:

  • In anecdotes shared by those in the industry, 20–30% of providers are unresponsive during attestation requests. Attestation is not a sufficient data-collection tool and does not result in data quality.
  • Many systems rely on heavily manual workflows, causing delays in data updates. Human error degrades data quality
  • Provider abrasion and long turnaround times are present when constantly attesting to information
  • Phone calls, even when used for verification, have a 20% variability rate. Meaning, if your call center has two people call the same provider twice in one day, you’ll get a different answer 20% of the time

Why Does CMS Audit Provider Directories?

A few years ago, a CMS Online Provider Directory Review Report looked at Medicare Advantage directories and found that 52% had at least one inaccuracy. The areas of deficiency included such errors as:

  • The provider was not at the location listed,
  • The phone number was incorrect, or
  • The provider was not accepting new patients when the directory indicated they were.

And, despite provisions in the 2021 No Surprises Act legislation, new research has shown that directories remain inconsistent, one study citing “of the almost 450,000 doctors found in more than one directory, just 19% had consistent address and specialty information.” (Let alone complete accurate information including phone numbers.) The audits continually find inaccuracies as the years go on.

How Do Health Plans Prepare for CMS Audits?

Traditional approaches to audit preparation include phone calls and mock audits.

Phone Calls

Pricey and oftentimes inconsistent, call campaigns amount to hundreds of thousands of phone calls being made every day to check data.

Mock Audits

Mimics the audit experience with sample sets of small amounts of data but are not reflective of the overall directory.

These approaches are not sufficient for achieving successful audit results.

What Is CMS Looking for in Audits of Directories?

Not all information is equally important during an audit. The scoring algorithm assigns different weights for fields so if you’re starting somewhere, Veda recommends starting with the key areas of focus: Name, Address, Phone, Speciality, and Accepting Patients.

Addressing the most important data elements with quality validated data will move a health plan towards audit success.

How Veda’s Solutions Interpret and Address CMS Audit Results

CMS performs audits to advocate for members and better outcomes so interpreting audit results is the perfect place to get started with directory updates. Our research shows that when it comes to what members care about it is pretty simple: Choice, Accuracy, and Accessibility —meaning the ability to schedule, with their preferred provider, easily and quickly. On the first try. 

Where to Start For CMS Audit Success

Many health plans are realizing that achieving directory accuracy and audit success is not a one-and-done. An ongoing surveillance approach is needed to confidently prepare and ultimately, achieve success in an audit.  

Veda’s approach consistently evaluates the directory to provide ongoing insights. For example, we leverage technology to identify and prioritize providers for updates who haven’t attested recently, to ensure they have a data trail that supports their current status and information in a directory. By prioritizing bad data, this audit strategy is efficient and effective.

Diagnose your provider directory and fix critical data errors ahead of CMS audits with Veda.

You know your business. We know data.

One Simplified Platform

Veda’s provider data solutions help healthcare organizations reduce manual work, meet compliance requirements, and improve member experience through accurate provider directories. Select your path to accurate data.

Velocity
ROSTER AUTOMATION

Standardize and verify unstructured data with unprecedented speed and accuracy.

Vectyr
PROFILE
SEARCH

The most up-to-date, comprehensive, and accurate data source of healthcare providers, groups, and facilities on the market.

Quantym
DIRECTORY ANALYSIS

Review and refresh your network directory to identify areas that affect your quality metrics.

Resources & Insights

Provider Data Solution Veda Automates Over 59 Million Hours of Administrative Healthcare Tasks Since 2019
October 21, 2024
HealthX Ventures Blog: How Veda Is Aiming to Fix Healthcare’s Broken Provider Directories
October 17, 2024
Contact Veda Today

Take your healthcare data to the next level

Let’s transform your healthcare data. Contact Veda to learn how our solutions can help your organization improve efficiency and data accuracy.